Click any tag below to further narrow down your results
Links
A walkthrough of using Grok Bot, prompted by an Elon Musk post, to run a small directory site: pick a dull niche, have the bot publish one useful page a night, and track traffic and affiliate revenue over Telegram. The pitch is that each page keeps pulling visitors long after it goes live.
- The core idea is to buy or build boring internet real estate in a narrow niche instead of starting a conventional startup, with the bot handling publishing and outreach.
- The workflow is one scheduled page per night, sourced from recurring complaints on X and Reddit, with affiliate and referral deals researched and drafted automatically.
- Payoff depends on traffic and testing: the author says you don't need millions of visitors, just the right ones finding something useful.
This is a short, sarcastic X post playing along with a quote-tweet that asks why people who dislike Elon Musk still use his platform. The author jokes that they are the "indigenous people" of Jack Dorsey's Twitter and that Musk is their coloniser, refusing to leave.
- The post is satirical: it frames continued use of X as a stubborn refusal to leave, borrowing colonial and indigenous-rights language for comic effect.
- It responds to a quote-tweet from @stockbella, which points out the apparent contradiction of disliking Musk while still using his platform.
- It is a single informal post with no data, sources, or arguments beyond the joke.
Elon Musk has publicly come out in favor of combining Tesla and SpaceX, his two most valuable companies, in what would be the largest corporate deal ever attempted. The piece looks at why he wants it locked in before Trump leaves office.
- Musk has moved from private interest to open support for merging Tesla and SpaceX.
- Boards at both companies are reportedly studying a possible deal valued around $3.5 trillion.
- The timing is tied to the political window before Trump's exit from office.
Documentarian Alex Gibney explains how his four-hour film about Elon Musk took shape, from an early, mostly admiring view of Musk to a more critical one as Musk's political turn and Twitter behavior unfolded. He also covers why Musk refused to sit for an interview and how that and other people's fear of Musk shaped the film.
- Gibney started the project seeing Musk as an intriguing maverick inventor, and says the film's tone shifted as his public conduct escalated.
- The film was originally planned as a two-hour version, but Musk's involvement with Trump led HBO to push for more material, expanding it to four hours.
- Musk never agreed to an interview; he responded to outreach by calling Gibney a "douche" on Twitter, and many other insiders declined to go on camera for fear of lawsuits or career consequences.
- The host argues Musk's public image was shaped by coverage he never fully followed, and that footage in the film shows a side of him the host didn't see during their friendship.
Men who work in tech, especially at firms like Palantir and Tesla, say their jobs now trigger suspicion or rejection from potential partners because the industry is seen as politically and morally compromised. The piece follows several daters and a matchmaker to show how workers hide or justify their employers to get dates.
- Daters describe brutal reactions to naming a Palantir or Tesla employer, including one woman calling a man "the devil" and friends asking him not to mention the job on nights out.
- Men are hiding or fudging their jobs: one Palantir engineer says he lists his work as "AI" and invents explanations, while a Tesla employee found he got more matches on Raya by leaving his employer off his profile.
- Matchmaker Amy Laurent now pre-empts objections when pitching tech clients, saying "Listen, I have a great guy… He's in tech," and women cite the industry's record on misinformation, addiction, labor, and wealth inequality as reasons to refuse.
X is experiencing a genuine resurgence in influence despite stagnant business metrics, driven by high-profile users and better product execution, while competitors like Threads and Bluesky struggle to match its cultural grip on information distribution and the AI community.
- X's revival isn't about user growth but about regaining control as the primary platform for breaking news, tech discourse, and AI discussions—something Threads can't replicate despite having potentially larger user numbers.
- Major executives (NVIDIA's Jensen Huang, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, even Mark Zuckerberg) are actively using X specifically because that's where key communities like AI developers congregate, making it a business necessity rather than a preference.
- Musk solved X's financial bleeding by merging it into SpaceX's business structure alongside xAI, effectively turning the social network into a marketing expense rather than a standalone money-loser, which freed it to become a decent product again.
Elon Musk announced that his Boring Co. is developing a tunnel to connect Austin and San Antonio, Texas. The project would cut travel time between the cities from up to 2.5 hours to under 30 minutes.
- Current drive between Austin and San Antonio takes up to 2.5 hours due to traffic congestion
- Boring Co. claims the tunnel would reduce that journey to under 30 minutes consistently
- The company already operates a facility in Bastrop, Texas, suggesting active development in the region
Elon Musk's Twitter takeover wasn't just a business move—it was a calculated political strategy that algorithmically elevated right-wing voices and reshaped what journalists and users perceive as normal discourse. The article argues that social media doesn't primarily spread misinformation; instead, it distorts our sense of what's socially acceptable and what coalitions actually believe, creating isolated "publics" where people mistake niche ideologies for mainstream movements. The platform's toxicity is intentional and structural, turning casual users into unwitting workers for the algorithm while their language, thoughts, and political instincts get colonized by platform incentives.
- Musk's Twitter takeover algorithmically boosted right-wing voices and paying supporters, engineering a visible rightward shift rather than just running a business.
- Social media's main danger isn't spreading misinformation but creating "malformed publics"—distorting people's sense of what's normal and what others actually believe.
- Journalists and media figures absorbed this distorted reality as a "vibe shift," mistaking a poisoned window into public opinion for an actual leftward-to-rightward change in the world.
- Fringe Twitter ideas (like Helen Andrews' "gay race communism" joke) get laundered into mainstream outlets like the Wall Street Journal, showing how algorithmic incentives now manufacture culture without real creativity.
Elon Musk’s lawsuit over OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit model kicks off in Oakland, with Musk, Sam Altman and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella set to testify. The case highlights internal clashes as OpenAI faces fierce AI competition and gears up for a potential $1 trillion IPO.
- Musk's lawsuit against Altman and OpenAI's board over its shift to a for-profit model goes to trial in Oakland, with Musk, Altman, and Satya Nadella testifying.
- OpenAI's lawyers will argue Shivon Zilis, ex-board member and mother of four of Musk's children, leaked sensitive inside information to Musk.
- Musk claims the for-profit restructuring betrayed the nonprofit's mission and diluted early backers' control; Altman argues it was necessary to fund massive compute costs.
- The trial unfolds as OpenAI competes with rivals like Anthropic and prepares for a possible IPO valuing it near $1 trillion.
Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman’s OpenAI for billions in damages, claiming breaches stemming from their 2015 co-founding agreement. The jury trial, starting Monday, could reshape the competitive dynamics in the A.I. industry.
- Musk is suing OpenAI for billions plus a board seat, alleging Altman and Brockman abandoned the founding nonprofit mission without his consent when they raised $10B+ from Microsoft and gave investors control.
- OpenAI counters that Musk left the board in 2018 before the for-profit shift and Microsoft deal, and claims he's really just bitter about missing out on ChatGPT's success.
- Key evidence includes emails where Altman and Brockman said they'd keep Musk "at arm's length" on fundraising—Musk calls this proof of bad faith, OpenAI calls it casual banter.
- The verdict could ripple across the AI industry, either chilling OpenAI's partnerships and investor confidence or validating founder-to-investor governance shifts at other startups.
Max Read interviews Ben Tarnoff and Quinn Slobodian about their book Muskism: A Guide for the Perplexed, arguing Elon Musk’s business style and political interventions form a distinct ideology akin to Fordism. They outline how Musk’s methods and public projects coalesce into a coherent framework worth analyzing.
- Tarnoff and Slobodian frame "Muskism" as a coherent ideology comparable to Fordism, not just erratic billionaire behavior
- Musk's pattern: propose a grand technological goal, use public/government resources to build it, then privatize the gains while spinning failures into legend
- Despite seemingly contradictory stances on climate, labor, and free speech, they argue an accelerationist logic ties it together—move fast, break norms, concentrate power
- Twitter's dismantled content moderation serves as their prime example of Muskism as a live experiment in radical deregulation
Banks and firms involved in SpaceX's IPO must buy subscriptions to Elon Musk’s Grok AI service. Some banks are reportedly spending tens of millions to integrate Grok into their systems. SpaceX recently filed its IPO paperwork amid ongoing legal issues related to Grok's AI technology.
- Musk is requiring banks and firms working on SpaceX's IPO to buy Grok subscriptions
- Some banks are spending tens of millions of dollars to integrate Grok into their IT systems
- This is happening while Grok faces investigations over generating CSAM and nude images
- Musk also pushed banks to advertise on X, though less forcefully than the Grok requirement